A while ago I read a
report about a fast food company owner who suggested that he could
replace most, if not all, of his staff through automation. I thought,
“how would he feel if he could be replaced by automation”. Is
their work really that much more complicated that cooking hamburgers.
My original idea was that this could be a concept for a story, but I
also wondered if it were possible.
Who Are the One
Percent?
At the outset I want
to define who I have in mind. My view is that the elite of society
can be divided into two groups, the financial elite and the
intellectual elite. I believe most people think of the financial
elite when they hear the term one percent. That is who I have in
mind.
What is the Role
the One Percent Play in Society?
I believe that the
one percent plays a useful role in society. Their role is to decide
where money is invested. This is necessary for any economic system to
function. By way of contrast, the intellectual elite provide ideas
and innovations for society. Of course there are a few individuals
that will fit into both groups.
Can Artificial
Intelligence(AI) Systems Perform the Role of the One Percent?
I strongly suspect
that the role of the one percent can be automated. A large part of
their work is clerical in nature, which we know can be automated. A
great deal of work has already been done to automate the financial
system.
Consider a couple
examples:
-
Investment firms use computer based systems to manage their stock trades;
-
Banks use automated systems to evaluate loan applications.
These systems have
been controversial because of undesirable side effects. However, I
think they do show that a well designed AI could very well be able to
play the same role as the one percent.
What Would AI
Investors be Like?
I imagine that these
AI investors would not be mobile robots, but would be accessed
through the Internet. I expect that there would be some kind of
central system to monitor the AI investors and facilitate their inter
communication. However, there would be many individual AI investors,
no two exactly alike. Possibly every person would have their own.
This would make the financial system more of a free market.
Advantage: AI
Systems Are Not Greedy
Some people say that
“greed is good”, but I don't agree. The basis of free markets is
that people work in their own self interest. Deciding on your self
interest is an intellectual process. In contrast, greed is an
emotional process.
My late wife had a
story that illustrates this point.
A monkey was
travelling through a forest and came across a banana tree. He climbed
up and took a banana from the tree in one hand. Then he took a second
banana in his other hand. He was greedy and wanted more bananas. He
put one banana under his armpit and held it there will his arm. He
then took a third banana. He was still greedy and wanted more
bananas. He did the same thing with the banana in his other hand.
He now had four
bananas. That still wasn't enough for him. He held up his arm to put
another banana under his arm pit. When he did that, the banana there
fell to the ground. He then grabbed another banana, which left him
with four bananas. This continued for hours. He had picked hundreds
of bananas, but still only had four. The rest littered the forest
floor below, of no use to him or anyone else.
A monkey who was
concerned with their self interest would have stopped after four
bananas, or maybe even two.
Advantage: AI
Systems Do Not Need to Make a Profit
Profit would have no
meaning to an AI investor. Its only goal would be to stay solvent. It
would tend to remain about the same size and would not grow to the
point where it could exert control over the market.
Advantage: AI
Systems Would Not Exert Political Influence
One of the
complaints about the one percent is the influence they have in
politics. AI investors would have no political interests, and
therefore, would have no influence.
Disadvantage: AI
Systems Could Malfunction or be Hacked
Anyone who has
worked with computers knows that bugs can arise in any system. This
would be a real problem with AI investors. It would require methods
to monitor and correct problems as they develop. If, as I suggested
earlier, there are large numbers of independent AI investors,
individual bugs would be less likely to cause systematic problems.
Hacking could be a
more serious problem. There are many people who would try to hack
into AI investors, or even the central system, to turn things to
their advantage. This is a problem with current computers systems.
Large scale efforts are under way to address hacking, and will likely
continue in the future. Again, monitoring systems and having large
numbers of AI investors would help mitigate the impact of hacking.
Could This
Happen?
While I think this
approach is technically feasible in the longer term, it would need to
overcome substantial barriers. Not the least of which would be that
the current members of the one percent would be reluctant to give up
their positions to an AI system.
I still think it
might make a good premise for a story though.
This post is a mirror from my main blog http://www.dynamiclethargyfilms.ca/blog